Authenry

Work

Research & strategy2025

Choosing a virtual world

A framework for comparing virtual-world platforms before an immersive pilot.

Three ways to build the pilot, comparedDrawn from p. 40
Unity, customWebXR, customRecommendedReady-madeCustomisabilityVery highHighLimitedHosting and data controlFull controlFull controlVendor cloudLearning curveMediumMediumVery lowPerformanceHighModerateModerate

Findings

  1. 01

    For the “foresight universe” pilot, a web-based XR framework such as A-Frame, Three.js, or Babylon.js is recommended.p. 43

  2. 02

    Pre-built platforms provide strong out-of-the-box multi-user capabilities—including avatars, voice communication, and collaboration tools—without the need for custom development.p. 40

  3. 03

    However, should more demanding use cases arise — such as advanced visual fidelity or specialised hardware integration — the work completed for the pilot, including all assets, data structures, and design patterns, can be ported into a Unity or Unreal environment with minimal re-work.p. 46

Virtual worlds
  1. From the report

    While these platforms can accelerate pilot deployment, they may necessitate rebuilding the experience in a custom environment for future phases, potentially reducing the long-term reusability of pilot assets and logic.p. 40

    Ready-made platforms compared against the criteriap. 40

    Users in one space, built in
    Spatialup to 50 (free)
    Frameup to 30 easily
    Hubs~25

Start a conversation

It is about

Write to us